|
 The NPC uses an industry/government agreement to reduce wasteful packaging. It has a self regulatory component but has come under severe criticism from NGOs and Environment Ministers. Major changes were made in mid-2005 including the prospect of stronger regulation if the NPC fails to deliver on its targets.
Background
Only about half of the 3.3m tonnes of packaging is recycled each year. Major recycling contributions are from the paper and aluminium sectors, but steel, glass and plastics are performing poorly. While local council kerbside collections are important, 'away from home' packaging is now over 50% of the problem and there is virtually no collection infrastructure for recycling. Overall Australia lags behind the best European and American schemes.
The NPC was due for renewal in late 2004 but Environment Ministers demanded improved performance. In 2005 they imposed ambitious new recycling targets for each material and no increase in packaging waste to landfill; greater accountability through action plans; appointed a community representative to the National Packaging Covenant Council; and provided for a mid term review in 2008, which could lead to its dismantling if substantial progress is not made.
National Packaging Covenant site - includes the NPC and stakeholder evaluations.
The Debate
The community and NGOs have lost patience with industry. They say it is continuing to dodge responsibility for the products and packaging waste they create. Industry strongly defends its programs and asks for more time and self regulation, to solve complicated problems. A flashpoint is the role of container deposits which create a financial incentive to establish a collection system for away from home waste; can support kerbside and is being increasingly adopted. Industry argues it is an out of date policy and is not worth the additional cost to the consumer.
Environmental position (Boomerang Alliance)
Packaging Industry position
TEC Position
TEC has signed the NPC and represents the community on the Governing Council. We are tracking progress up to the mid-term review and will then assess what further action should be taken. We support container deposits as the only viable way to create a collection system and stable supply to reycling plants.
Address to Packaging Council Dinner (May 2005) - Jeff Angel, TEC |
